Art: Statue of Caligula – Virginia Museum of Fine Arts

There he stands—marble-cut, toga-draped, arms missing but ego intact. The statue of Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus Germanicus, better known to the world as Caligula, resides today not in Rome but in the staid quiet of the VMFA’s B. Cochrane Collection. Chiseled in the early 1st century CE by an anonymous Roman sculptor, this piece is a masterwork of imperial propaganda rendered in cool Carrara. The craftsmanship is undeniable: a portrait that combines technical finesse with thematic contradiction. The face is soft, youthful, almost contemplative—a paradox, considering that history remembers Caligula not for thoughtful governance but for four years of tyrannical and theatrical lunacy that reportedly included declaring war on Neptune and installing his horse in the Senate. This statue doesn’t just capture a man; it sells a myth.

The artist—unrecorded, of course, as most Roman craftsmen were—was no amateur. Likely trained in an imperial workshop or patronized by an elite household with ties to the palace, this sculptor was part of a visual machine that cranked out god-kings by the ton. Rome didn’t believe in subtle messaging. This statue channels the Augustan model of power: civil, moral, stoic. That Caligula wore it like a badly tailored costume is beside the point. The artist’s job wasn’t to critique; it was to canonize. So, he gave us a contrapposto stance, a gaze that reaches heavenward, and a toga that looks heavy enough to crush a lesser mortal—marble artistry as political marketing. The genius of the artist lies not in originality, but in the confident manipulation of the visual language of legitimacy. It’s the aesthetic equivalent of airbrushing a dictator onto Mount Rushmore.

Historically, this statue sits at the knife’s edge of imperial Rome’s public-private dissonance. Caligula began his rule beloved, the grandson of Augustus, the soldier’s darling (his nickname “Caligula” meaning “little boots”). But that goodwill curdled fast. His rule was so erratic and violent that his memory was officially condemned—his name struck from monuments, his likenesses destroyed. This statue’s survival, then, is a rebellious artifact. It’s a piece of state-sponsored idealism that time and truth failed to bury. In it, we see the Roman Empire’s uncanny ability to dress madness in marble and call it majesty. The very fact that this statue is beautiful and serene while its subject was likely unhinged is precisely the point: Rome was built on the performance of order even as it flirted constantly with chaos.

Today, the statue forces us to confront the limits of representation. How often do we believe in images that don’t align with reality? What modern Caligulas are we still sculpting in policy papers, photo ops, or perfectly filtered press releases? Museums love to describe this work as “idealized,” but perhaps we should be asking: idealized for whom? For the people, to soothe their unrest? For the emperor, to enshrine his delusions? Or for us, two thousand years later, to remind us that power always looks best when it’s pretending to be wise?

#CaligulaAtVMFA #ImperialPropaganda #RomanArt #DamnatioMemoriae #PowerAndPortraiture #MuseumsAreNotNeutral #TogaWithATwist #AncientMadnessModernEyes