Once upon a time, someone walked into a pitch meeting and said, “You know what the world needs? A reboot of one of the most upsetting, polarizing films of the 1970s, but make it glossier, dumber, and with James Marsden!” Straw Dogs(2011) is what happens when you remake a psychological horror-thriller with all the nuance of a brick through a bay window. This is not a film that whispers menace—it yells it through a megaphone, chucks it at your face, and then wonders why you’re not clapping.
When Good Ideas Go Bad and Then Keep Going
The original Straw Dogs (1971), directed by Sam Peckinpah, was a powder keg—morally ambiguous, uncomfortably intelligent, and explosive in its violence. The 2011 version? More like a soggy firecracker that fizzles and still manages to blow up the backyard. Rod Lurie, once a journalist, tried his hand at directing again and thought he could drag this film into the American South and give it relevance. Instead, he gave it a sunburn and a confused screenplay.
Changing the setting from Cornwall to Mississippi might’ve seemed like a bold reinterpretation, but it actually feels like someone yelling “Hey y’all!” in a room where no one asked for regional flair. The shift in David’s profession from mathematician to screenwriter is equally bold—and equally useless. Great, now he’s a pacifist and has writer’s block. It’s less about building tension and more about watching a man lose a staring contest with a roofing crew.
The Less Said, the Better
James Marsden plays David Sumner with all the testosterone of a soy latte. His arc—from passive writer to murderous home-defense warlord—feels less like a transformation and more like a personality transplant performed in a hardware store aisle. Kate Bosworth’s Amy has all the emotional range of a character written by someone who read half of a psychology article once, and thought trauma worked like an on/off switch.
And then there’s the rape scene. Let’s talk about the elephant in the living room: it’s vile. Not just for its content, but for how it’s shot. The camera lingers with the tact of a lecherous uncle at Thanksgiving. Kate Bosworth told Skarsgård to “just go for it,” which might explain why the scene feels like an overbudgeted snuff film with better lighting. If this was supposed to be a character study in masculinity and repression, it ends up more like an amateur psychology dissertation written in blood and drywall dust.
Unloved, Unwanted, and Unnecessary
Critics greeted Straw Dogs with the warmth of a cold shower. Rotten Tomatoes slapped it with a 42% like a disappointed gym teacher handing back your essay. Roger Ebert, bless his consistent soul, gave it 3 stars—proving that even legends have off days. Everyone else seemed to agree that this remake, much like unseasoned grits, lacked flavor, nuance, and any reason to exist.
The film flopped commercially, pulling in $11 million against a $25 million budget, which is Hollywood code for “oops.” Its legacy? An asterisk in a Wikipedia article, a cautionary tale for future remakes, and an uncomfortable reminder that just because you can remake a film doesn’t mean you should. Especially not when the most memorable character is a bear trap.
No Bark, No Bite, Just a Limp Whimper
Straw Dogs (2011) is what you get when you copy someone’s homework but change a few words to avoid suspicion—and end up submitting a hate crime instead. It’s not bold, it’s not insightful, and it certainly isn’t necessary. It’s the cinematic equivalent of microwaving roadkill and calling it stew. Peckinpah’s original may have been controversial, but at least it knew what it was doing. This one? This one just looks confused.
⭐️☆☆☆☆ (1/5)
#StrawDogs2011 #RemakeFail #RodLurieWhatHappened #BearTrapOscars #KateBosworthDeservedBetter #HollywoodToneDeaf #CinemaCrimeScene
No comments:
Post a Comment