Once upon a time, in a land of grand sets, too-tight corsets, and a studio head who thought a white elephant death was the peak of drama, The King and I danced its way into cinema history. Not waltzed—danced, dammit, like two stiff-lipped lovers with unresolved cultural trauma. This 1956 Technicolor behemoth is the cinematic equivalent of your great-aunt’s beloved porcelain doll: ornate, imperious, and unsettlingly racist if you look too close. It’s beautiful. It’s sweeping. It’s also a colonial fever dream with a show tune playlist and a stubborn refusal to check the facts.
From Memoir to Musical to Mega-Budget MGM Mayhem
The film is technically based on Margaret Landon’s novel Anna and the King of Siam, which is based on the probably-exaggerated, possibly-fibbed memoirs of Anna Leonowens, a real-life Victorian governess who tutored the children of King Mongkut of Siam in the 1860s. Anna’s gift for storytelling rivaled Stephen King’s, only with fewer clowns and more imperialism. She claimed to tame an exotic monarch, promote British values, and subtly end slavery while dodging malaria with nothing but sheer moral superiority and a feathered hat.
Rodgers and Hammerstein, Broadway’s favorite sugarcoated sermonizers, latched onto this with their usual flair for turning sociopolitical friction into tap-worthy musicals. After conquering the stage with Oklahoma! and South Pacific, they took one look at the East and thought: “What this needs is a polka.” The musical debuted in 1951 and became an instant hit. So naturally, 20th Century Fox saw box office dollar signs and greenlit a film version that would cost ten times what the stage production did. Because why just suggest Orientalism when you can paint it across 40 massive sets with elephants and gold lamé?
The King, the Queen, and the Dubbing Queen
Now enter Yul Brynner, a man so committed to baldness and bellowing that he made playing a patriarchal despot charming. He originated the role on Broadway, won a Tony, then sauntered onto the Fox lot and grabbed his Oscar like it was his birthright. His competition was Marlon Brando, whom the studio briefly considered for the role. Imagine The King and I with Brando mumbling about “the white elephants of our discontent.” Brynner was better. He knew the part, owned the part, and probably rewrote the part while the director blinked.
Opposite him was Deborah Kerr, luminous and composed, a red-haired pillar of British resolve. Just one problem: she couldn’t sing. Enter Marni Nixon, the ghost singer of Hollywood, who matched Kerr’s facial expressions beat-for-beat while coughing through a head cold. Between the two of them, they gave us a pitch-perfect Anna who could warble about getting to know you while internally debating if hoop skirts should come with hazard pay.
Production was hellishly ornate. Irene Sharaff’s gowns weighed as much as a small toddler, and Kerr bruised herself dancing in them. Rita Moreno’s headgear caused migraines, the sets were the size of football fields, and there was real talk of rewriting the ending so the King dies by elephant impalement. Yul Brynner reportedly threatened to torch the Fox lot if they went through with it.
From Censored in Siam to Shelved in Bangkok
When it premiered at the Roxy Theatre in 1956, The King and I became a box office hit and the fifth highest-grossing film of the year. It won five Oscars, including Best Actor for Brynner, but was the only Rodgers and Hammerstein musical adaptation to land an acting win. Still, critical voices grumbled about the sanitized politics and missing songs. Studio cuts dropped gems like “I Have Dreamed” and “Shall I Tell You What I Think of You?”—probably because the latter hit a little too close to Darryl Zanuck’s ego.
Thailand banned it outright. Turns out the Thai royal family didn’t love being portrayed as a collection of childish concubines and indecisive autocrats. They also didn’t appreciate Anna’s inflated importance, or her claim that she singlehandedly dragged Siam into the 19th century by teaching polka. Subsequent kings even told her to stop lying—she didn’t. In modern terms, Anna was history’s original LinkedIn influencer.
Still, the film has endured, if only as a glittering time capsule of mid-century moralizing and Technicolor ambition. It’s a staple in AFI’s endless parade of lists: greatest musicals, greatest romances, greatest songs you didn’t know were about cultural assimilation. And yes, there have been remakes—a dull TV series in 1972, a bizarre animated film in 1999, and a planned reboot announced in 2021 that may or may not involve CGI elephants and Lin-Manuel Miranda.
A Waltz with Complications
The King and I is lavish, iconic, and deeply problematic. It’s the cinematic equivalent of a diplomatic dinner where everyone gets food poisoning but the desserts are exquisite. You can admire the artistry and still wince at the subtext. For every unforgettable polka, there’s a reminder that this is Orientalism dressed in organza. But hey, it’s a puzzlement, isn’t it?
⭐️⭐️⭐️ (3/5)
#YulBrynnerRules #DeborahKerrMelts #MarniNixonDeservedMore #HoopSkirtTrauma #ShallWeDanceOrColonize #BannedInBangkok #RodgersAndHammersteinButMakeItImperial #CinemaScopeDelusion
No comments:
Post a Comment